Recommended for a clerical/administrative job.

According to his test results, John would likely do well in a career as an administrative or clerical worker. Although he scored above average on most scales, there are some areas that he could improve on. With a concerted effort, he could excel in this field. Overall, from a psychological point of view, he is well suited for a position in the clerical field.

Overall results (score 70)

Recommended for a clerical/administrative job.

According to his test results, John would likely do well in a career as an administrative or clerical worker. Although he scored above average on most scales, there are some areas that he could improve on. With a concerted effort, he could excel in this field. Overall, from a psychological point of view, he is well suited for a position in the clerical field.

Work Habits (score 63)

John's score indicates that he has fairly good work habits. These are the skills that will allow him to get his work done both effectively and efficiently. Although he did rather well in this area, there is still room for improvement.

Diligence (score 71)

His score on the Diligence scale indicates that John is rather diligent. He perseveres in meeting goals by being deliberate and focused. He is dutiful and works hard to complete a task properly. He keeps his goal in mind and works according to perceived expectations. While he doesn't always make reaching his goals his top priority, he usually completes his tasks or projects, even if it's not perfectly on time.

Organization (score 71)

John is a fairly methodical and orderly person. He usually incorporates systems into various areas of his life. He is able to organize his time, tasks and belongings in an orderly fashion, but on a few occasions, may not stick to this routine. While planning and orderliness are not his primary concerns, he puts in a concerted effort to live an organized life.

Time Management (score 63)

It seems that John has a pretty good grasp of both the basics and the more advanced strategies for effective time management. He has developed the skills of setting priorities, cutting down on distractions and following schedules. He recognizes that he may have to say no to other people from time to time in order to get things done, and goes out of his way to find more effective ways of accomplishing tasks. While he may give in to certain bad habits on occasion, he manages to keep the slip-ups to a minimum, which surely makes his career run much more smoothly - not to mention giving him the reputation of a productive, reliable individual.

Dependability (score 88)

John scored very high on the Dependability scale, which indicates that he almost always does what he says he will. When he makes commitments, he keeps them and takes pride in doing so. Coworkers and friends alike can count on him to keep his word and to do a complete and thorough job on any task. He is reliable and loyal, and does his best to keep his promises.

Attention to Detail (score 68)

His results indicate that John is fairly attentive to detail. He tries to tie up all loose ends before declaring a project complete, and usually catches errors that others missed. To him, there is no such thing as an insignificant detail because every finer point counts; a complete job means accounting for every step, down to the smallest element.

Efficiency (score 67)

According to John's score, he is an efficient individual who is usually looking for ways to save time, energy, and material. Although he doesn't always complete his tasks in the most time-effective manner, he frequently implements shortcuts into his day in order to increase efficiency whenever possible or convenient.

Self-discipline (score 43)

John's score on this scale indicates that he is moderately self-disciplined. While he is usually able to overcome reluctance for unpleasant tasks, at times he fails to motivate himself to accomplish his goals. He sometimes allows barriers such as fatigue and boredom to push him off track. When necessary however, he is able to overcome these obstacles and use his time wisely and motivate himself effectively. Overall, he does not have severe problems with self-discipline, but there are times when he may need that extra push to get him going and keep himself on track.

Concentration (score 55)

John's test score shows that he sometimes struggles with concentration, but generally comes out on top. He possesses most of the skills required to minimize distractions and zone in on the task at hand, but isn't always able to employ them in full-force. He can recognize an interrupting thought when it pops into his head, but occasionally lacks the mental focus to boot it out and get back to work. If he has the determination to clear his mind and get the job done, he should be able to prevent his mind from wandering off on unrelated tangents.

Initiative (score 60)

John has higher-than-average motivation, which means he takes steps to increase his own productivity and take the initiative to optimize the company's success. When an opportunity to climb the corporate ladder arises, he usually volunteers to take advantage of it. He enjoys coming up with new ideas and projects, which he typically has the incentive to implement on his own. When a task needs completing, whether it is his responsibility or not, he usually sees that it gets taken care of.

Adaptability/Trainability (score 60)

John seems to be a flexible person and adapting to change, for the most part, is not a problem for him. He is open-minded and willing to learn and explore, which takes energy and courage. In light of new developments he is willing to go with the flow, as well as change his opinions if necessary. Technological advances in office automation have increased the demand for clerical workers who are adaptable and versatile. Therefore a promising and successful candidate would be open to and optimistic about the possibility of retraining and continuing their education to keep up-to-date.

Tolerance for Routine Work (score 50)

According to John's results, he is not the type of person who particularly enjoys routine work. Repetitive tasks sometimes bore him and may, on occasion, cause him to lose focus and motivation. Clerical jobs are, for the most part, fairly routine. He is someone who prefers variety, so set schedules would not satisfy his desire for free reign, but he can deal relatively well. An occupation that has a mix of both varied and routine tasks would likely suit him.

Interpersonal Skills (score 46)

John's results indicate that his interpersonal skills are relatively good, but could use some work. It is essential for clerical workers to have excellent interpersonal skills since a large part of the job involves working with clients. It would be well worth the effort to improve in this area.

Communication Skills (score 62)

According to his results, John is generally able to listen to others to understand where they are coming from. He is also quite proficient at getting his point across clearly when engaged in conversation. If he would like to develop his full potential and bring his communication skills to an even higher level, all he needs is a little effort. Being able to sense what others are feeling from non-verbal clues and being aware of his own role in the process can make all the difference between smooth communication and misunderstandings.

Conflict Resolution Skills (score 16)

Everyone must deal with conflict, whether it is professional or personal. People who deal well with conflict can minimize the damage caused by interpersonal disagreement, and come out of uncomfortable social situations in one piece. They can turn problems and disagreements into an opportunity to strengthen the relationship and build trust. Those who do not have this capability end up making mountains out of molehills, losing friendships or tarnishing work relations in the process. According to his results, John has very poor conflict resolution skills. He would do well to make an effort to improve his comfort and ability to deal with conflict. Conflict is an unavoidable fact of life - he may as well make the best of it.

Willingness to Compromise (score 36)

John is quite stubborn and uncompromising. He is rarely willing to abandon his own ideas for the sake of group harmony or set aside his personal goals in order to get along with others. He tends to reject integrating his ideas or meet people halfway. This means that he usually refuses to settle a situation unless he gets his way, making it almost impossible to reason with him. It is difficult for him to accommodate the needs of others because of his "my way or the highway" attitude.

Likeability (score 63)

Clerical workers often act as liaisons between companies and clients; therefore, these employees must have a pleasant attitude and possess excellent people skills. According to his results, John is quite an enjoyable and pleasant person. He is affable and friendly, and concerns himself with coming across as agreeable and pleasant to others. People enjoy his company because he is approachable, inoffensive, and easy to get along with. He is liked and accepted by almost everyone around him.

Desire for Control (score 40)

According to his results, John enjoys being in control and having the last word or final say when in a group setting. He likes having things done his way, and sometimes tends to lack appreciation for alternative suggestions. For the most part, he seems to desire power and at times may even manipulate others in order to achieve his goal.

Emotional Strength (score 28)

According to his results, John is not a very emotionally strong individual. His feelings, regardless of whether they are positive or negative, can be extreme in nature. This not only gives others the impression that he is often moody, but also inhibits his ability to deal with adversity and bounce back from hardship. His behaviors can also be spontaneous and impulsive. He has some difficulty controlling his anger and might take action without considering the possible consequences. It is to his advantage to put the effort into learning how to control and stabilize his emotions; it will improve both his mental and physical health.

Helpfulness (score 51)

According to his results, John scored in the mid-range for the Helpfulness scale. Although he may intend to be helpful and supportive, he might not always follow through. Despite his sometimes unsuccessful efforts, he seems to have a keen desire to maintain positive interpersonal relationships. He can improve his helpfulness by being consciously mindful of his actions and how they affect those around him.

Discretion (score 64)

According to John's results on the Discretion scale, he seems to have very little trouble recognizing situations that require his discretion. Whether the context is strictly confidential, on a "need-to-know" basis or a simple harmless secret, he usually keeps the information he has learned to himself, especially when the matter is delicate. He needs to make sure that his criteria for what constitutes confidential information are in line with others in his group, as well as with the laws and rules governing his profession. With a juicy piece of information in their hands, many people succumb to the temptation to share it, but this is not the case for him. It's a question of realizing what disclosure is inappropriate or unprofessional and controlling the urge to gossip. He puts himself in his client's shoes and considers how he would feel if a so-called professional leaked his personal information.

Reaction to Criticism (score 30)

According to his score, John becomes fairly defensive in response to constructive criticism. He often interprets criticism as an assault or threat to his character and rarely as an attempt to guide him in the right direction. He tends to regard both the critique and the critic negatively. More often than not, he is inclined to stand up and defend himself in response to what he sees as negative feedback. However, when criticized in an appropriate manner, this reaction is not necessary. He should learn to keep in mind that being defensive can mean missing out on some very valuable advice. He needs to try to understand that not all feedback is bad and that the purpose of constructive criticism is to teach rather than to torment. Also, {{he}] should remember that his interpretation of what has been said may not necessarily reflect his critic's intentions.

Office Skills (score 75)

John scored fairly well on the office skills section of the test and therefore, will likely require little additional training in this area. Clerical workers must be able to understand how to use office automation tools as well comprehend basic formulas, calculations and filing methods to complete certain tasks they may be given.

Arithmetic (score 44)

John had an average score on the arithmetic component of the test. Arithmetic is a branch of mathematics that generally deals with the application of the operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division of numbers. Arithmetic is a valuable skill for both everyday life and for careers requiring computation of any kind, as in the bookkeeping area of the clerical field.

Filing (score 93)

John's performance on the filing exercise was very good. It’s easy to misplace a document by putting it in the wrong place but it may not be so easy to find it again. This can be very frustrating especially if the information is important and needed right away. The purpose of filing is to be able to store information in an organized and neat manner, and retrieve it easily and quickly when needed. Even though filing systems may differ from company to company, John would likely be able to catch on very quickly.

Reading Comprehension (score 63)

John appears to be fairly good at understanding written materials, identifying the most important information and drawing appropriate conclusions based on the facts provided. Given that many of the tasks in the clerical field will require a strong comprehension of the written word, this is a great strength to have.

Graph and Chart Reading (score 100)

John's responses indicate that he is very capable of understanding graphs and charts, and rarely run into difficulty. When working in the clerical field, it is important to be familiar with the structure and components of charts so that he can recognize potentially important information.

Proofreading Skills (score 70)

According to John's performance on the proofreading exercise, his skills in this area are good. Clerical workers often need to verify very important documents in which good grammar and spelling are essential, so it is crucial to be as meticulous and accurate as possible.

Data Entry Skills (score 77)

John's score on the Data Entry component of this test was good. According to his results, he is generally able to accurately enter information into a database. He seems to be fairly familiar with the layout of the computer keyboard and the data and was able to complete this task at a reasonable pace.

Typing Skills (score 68)

John's score on the typing was good but could use a little improvement. Overall however, it appears as though he has little difficulty typing with speed and accuracy. These types of tasks are quite common in this field, so it is important that he continue to improve.

Short-term Memory Skills (score 91)

According to John's results on this scale, he is successfully able to store and retrieve information, meaning that he employs excellent memorization techniques. He also seems to be very good at processing new information quickly, allowing him to solve problems involving many variables without difficulty. The short-term memory acts as a scratch pad for retrieving temporary information, such as names and numbers. His ability to properly encode these in his memory means that he rarely, if ever, forgets such information.

Impression Management (score 0)

There was little or no indication in John's results to suggest that he was lying or trying to present himself in a favorable light.

Acquiescence (score 0)

This scale assesses whether a test-taker was simply agreeing with the test's statements, regardless of whether such attempts were conscious or subconscious. The answers are compared to responses obtained from a large sample of the general population. When someone systematically agrees to responses that are rarely endorsed by others, there is a good reason to believe that she/he is responding carelessly, which may invalidate the whole test.

According to his results, there is no indication that John answered the test questions carelessly. This means that he took the time to read and respond to each question carefully. Although this does not necessarily ensure the honesty of his answers, it does show that he took the test seriously.