|
Key Teamwork Competencies
Below are Sam's results on the different aspects of teamwork and team roles. The scales in this first section highlight the different personality traits and skills that are conducive to productivity and harmony in a group setting.
|
Group Interaction Skills (score 79)
| |
|
Encompasses traits and skills that are conducive to effective group interaction.
|
|
The complexities of group interaction necessitate the ability to get along with others, and this is an area where Sam is likely to do well given a little improvement. Teamwork requires a great deal of finesse, as disagreements, differences in opinions, and difficulties reaching consensus on a number of issues are likely to occur quite often. It is essential that the manner in which he interacts with others allows for group harmony. Review the results below for more information.
|
|
Conflict Resolution Expertise (score 70)
| |
|
Ability to resolve conflicts in a way that preserves relationships and helps maintain a positive group dynamic.
|
|
Sam appears to be rather skilled at resolving conflicts. He often selected many of the preferred methods of resolving disagreements highlighted on this assessment. Of course, he must be willing to put this knowledge to use in an actual group setting. If he is willing to do so, his interactions with others in the group will likely run much more smoothly, especially when differences in opinion occur - and they almost always do.
|
|
Team Problem-solving (score 78)
| |
|
Ability to collaborate with others in terms of problem-solving and brainstorming.
|
|
The problem-solving process of teamwork will not be too much of a challenge for Sam. When he and his teammates are trying to solve a problem, he seems to at least understand the importance of keeping an open mind and making decisions together. This will allow him to capitalize on the diversity of opinions and to utilize the different strengths in the group. While differences in opinions and different backgrounds can make teamwork a bit of a struggle, being open to this divergence can inspire numerous possibilities.
|
|
Interpersonal Skills (score 88)
| |
|
Ability to interact tactfully and respectfully in social situations.
|
|
Sam's interpersonal skills are excellent. This ability to be assertive, listen actively, and bring up sensitive issues tactfully is essential when working with others. Communicating to team members in a manner that shows respect, tact, and professionalism not only contributes to healthy team relationships, but is an asset when communicating with all people in a professional setting.
|
Team Management Ability (score 85)
| |
|
Ability to effectively complete tasks and functions in a team setting.
|
|
Sam's team management skills are excellent. An effective team member and leader in particular must know how to set realistic objectives, monitor the progress of the group, and possess good organizational skills. Keep in mind that when he is working in a group setting, members are expected to not only supervise themselves but also ensure that work gets done without having to turn to management for constant feedback. Review the breakdown of the results below.
|
|
Goal-setting (score 88)
| |
|
Ability to set goals and monitor progress to ensure that tasks are proceeding as planned.
|
|
Sam knows and has what it takes to set goals and to achieve them. Team members need to be able to set realistic yet challenging goals, both short and long-term, assess progress towards these objectives, and make changes as needed. This not only keeps the team on track, but setting individual goals for himself to achieve also contributes to self-motivation, self-improvement, and keeps him focused. Review the advice section for helpful tips on this aspect.
|
|
Planning and Coordination with Teammates (score 82)
| |
|
Ability to monitor and synchronize team functions.
|
|
The organizational aspect of teamwork is something Sam handles with ease. Duties, tasks, and roles must always be made clear in a group dynamic. Unlike individual work, teamwork requires constant updates on progress, obstacles and time delays, otherwise, the entire project may fall apart. Thankfully, he understands the importance of consulting with others and maintaining constant contact with his teammates.
|
Teamwork Orientation (score 57)
| |
|
Assesses whether an individual has a preference for teamwork or individual work.
|
|
It appears that Sam is equally comfortable with group and independent work, and is likely productive in both settings. Being able to flourish in a variety of situations is a hallmark of a productive and versatile employee.
|
| Team Roles |
|
In this section, there is a list of the team roles that Sam is most likely to take on when working in a group setting. His Dominant Team Roles are those that he may naturally lean towards and therefore, are most likely to fit him best. The Potential Team Roles are those which he may not take on as often, but which he can still execute with relative ease.
|
| Dominant Roles |
|
The following is a list of Sam's dominant team roles: Those which he is likely to adopt most often for the majority of group projects.
|
|
No team roles fall into this category.
|
| Potential Team Roles |
|
The following is a list of Sam's potential team roles: Those which he is likely to adopt on some occasions, depending on the dynamics of the group or the project that needs to be completed.
|
| Go-Getter (score 44) |
|
Similar to:
- Belbin's "Implementer"
- Margerison-McCann's "Upholder-Maintainer"
- MTR-I's "Crusader"
What do Sam's results mean?
According to Sam's score, he can and sometimes does adopt the role of Go-Getter in a group. He likes to complete tasks quickly and delays in his work can sometimes frustrate him. Nonetheless, the role of Go-Getter does not appear to be a constant for him.
Description of the role
The Go-Getter in a group is the person who wants to "get on with it". They have a clear focus and are not easily distracted from the task at hand. These individuals always want to move forward and delays can be extremely frustrating for them. People who fulfill the role of the Go-Getter are those with their eyes firmly set on the finish line. In fact, working toward a worthy purpose is one of their major motivators. They don't get easily sidetracked and tend to systematically and relentlessly work through all their tasks. Everything they do is focused on completing the project they've been assigned. Go-Getters tend to have a keen sense of right and wrong and strong personal values. They are typically loyal, disciplined, reliable and efficient individuals with rather conservative attitudes. These are the people who turn ideas into practical solutions and do everything they can to execute them.
Strengths of the role
Go-Getters are the fuel of the team. They get the project moving and don't waste time dragging their feet. They understand that deadlines are not just a recommendation and work towards the completion of tasks with all their energy. Go-Getters have an uncanny ability to see the simplest way to move forward. They are good at prioritizing and have a knack for identifying the most important issues or tasks.
Weaknesses of the role
Due to their passionate desire to move forward, Go-Getters may sometimes lack patience. They may not be very open to new ideas especially if they are presented after a project has already been started. A lack of action and a slow decision- making process are stressful for Go-Getters. To avoid what they consider unnecessary delays, they may want to steer their team away from essential group discussions and brainstorming. Some Go-Getters tend to jump in with both feet before fully assessing a project or idea. Go-Getters may also be perceived as bossy and can cause some hard feelings between team members when they insist on "getting moving".
|
| Thinker (score 44) |
|
Similar to:
- Belbin's "Implementer"
- Margerison-McCann's "Assessor-Developer"
- MTR-I's "Sculptor"
What do Sam's results mean?
Sam's score suggests that he can fulfill the role of Thinker in a group. Although this may not be his natural penchant when part of a team, he shows signs of being a good analyzer and problem-solver.
Description of the role
Thinkers are the individuals who come up with reasonable and practical ideas. They analyze situations and requirements and come up with realistic solutions. Disciplined, reliable and efficient in their approach, Thinkers excel at turning ideas into sensible solutions. Thinkers prefer to be innovative over inventive; they can put a realistic slant on a clever idea that may have seemed too far-fetched to implement. Thinkers are analytical and objective, and can see potential problems and anticipate difficulties before they arise. They feel compelled to assume various viewpoints when evaluating possibilities and opportunities, and enjoy a work environment that stimulates and challenges their intellectual curiosity. Good strategists, Thinkers prefer solutions that are supported by in-depth analysis.
Strengths of the role
Thinkers are very useful members of any team because of their realistic, practical approach to problem-solving, brainstorming, and decision-making. Thinkers provide a down-to-earth perspective that keeps strategies within the realm of the "possible".
Weaknesses of the role
Thinkers can sometimes be too down-to-earth. They may reject wild ideas or tone them down before it is clear whether or not they will work as proposed. Thinkers also tend to be extremely detail-oriented, which can slow down the progress in a group.
|
| Verifier (score 56) |
|
Similar to:
- Belbin's "Completer-Finisher"
- Margerison-McCann's "Controller-Inspector"
- MTR-I's "Curator"
What do Sam's results mean?
Sam's score indicates that he can, and sometimes does, adopt the role of Verifier in a group. Although being the Verifier may not be his natural penchant, he is rather good with details.
Description of the role
Verifiers are the detail-oriented individuals on a team. They act as quality controllers and are likely the last members in the group to agree that a job is complete. Typically, Verifiers need to ensure that a project has been properly finished and that all elements of the task have been taken into consideration before they can celebrate. In search of perfection, Verifiers are constantly on the lookout for errors and omissions. They are uncomfortable with rushed deadlines and quick handoffs and prefer to spend some time at the end of the task to review it fully. Verifiers are interested in maintaining the standards and procedures used within their team as a form of quality assurance.
Strengths of the role
Verifiers are the final checkpoint before project completion. These dedicated individuals will go through the final product with a fine-toothed comb before turning it over to a higher-up. Verifiers often do catch important omissions or gaffes and can be face-savers in these situations. Verifiers also keep a close eye on approaching deadlines - they don't want to be left with insufficient time to do a proper final review. They make for excellent product testers, are first-rate controllers, and thrive in environments that require quality assurance.
Weaknesses of the role
When Verifiers take their role to the extreme, they can become too nitpicky and waste valuable time reviewing things that may have been looked over already by other members of the group. Verifiers can also hamper the progress of a project with their insistence on following certain standards and procedures. Pressures to make decisions without allowing time for reflection and verification are often experienced as stressful. Verifiers do not feel comfortable with multi-tasking; they prefer to see one task completed before the next one begins. In addition, their perfectionistic tendencies may be aggravating for other team members.
|
79
