Overall Score (score 72)

John appears to be fairly well suited for an athletic career. Although he may need to work on certain areas, he scored well on most of the skills and traits covered in this assessment. Thus, from a psychological point of view, he seems to have what it takes to be a success in sports, above and beyond his natural abilities. If he put the effort in to improve upon his existing skills, he would definitely be a good candidate. More detailed information, including his strengths and weaknesses, is provided in the rest of the report.

Coachability (score 50)

John appears to be the type of player who is relatively easy to get along with and to coach, but may run into a few difficulties from time to time. He is generally the type of person who is rather humble, willing to learn, and fairly open to suggestions from the coaching staff, but players who score in this range may occasionally:

• Become somewhat offended and resentful if criticized.
• Be a sore loser.
• Be a little temperamental and demanding.
• Crave attention and praise from the coaching staff.

Work Ethic (score 78)

John has a fairly good work ethic and is generally a reliable person. The coaching staff can usually depend on him to be at his best. Players who score in this range tend to:

• Keep their word.
• Show up on time for practice.
• Put in a consistent effort.
• Follow through on promises.
• Comply with rules.

Competitiveness (score 93)

John is a very competitive player. He will let his competitive nature shine through, whether it's fighting for a top spot or battling for a win. Players who score in this range tend to:

• Try to outdo themselves (e.g. beat personal records).
• Try to outperform others; the more formidable the opponent is, the more they will want to beat their competitor.
• Get an adrenaline rush out of highly competitive situations, and have a strong desire to win.

Accountability (score 77)

John generally takes responsibility for his actions. He usually holds himself accountable for his own behavior, which could really help his performance. Development of a player presents many challenges, and one's ability to own errors and learn from mistakes is paramount to the process. It requires courage and humility, but taking responsibility is an attitude that earns the respect of others and develops one's own sense of self-respect. A potential downside to this otherwise great attitude is that John may sometimes bear the weight of the world on his shoulders. If taken to an extreme, it may have a negative impact on his self-confidence, but if channeled properly, it makes coaching much easier. Players who score in this range typically:

• Take responsibility for their actions, both good and bad, rarely blaming others.
• Feel in control of their life, rather than believing that outside sources control them, like destiny or luck.
• Create their own opportunities, rather than waiting for good things to come to them.
• Put situations in perspective and view them objectively.
• Admit mistakes and failures, and make up for them.

Self-Control (score 67)

John's self-control is quite good. He rarely loses control of his emotions, and can generally manage his behavior and motivate himself to get through obstacles and distractions - he seldom gives up or gives in. Players who score in this range will usually:

• Remain disciplined in the face of temptation .
• Regulate and channel negative emotions in a healthy manner.
• Behave appropriately and sensibly in most situations.
• Need little structure, but would adapt well to a structured environment (they may actually impose a structure on themselves).

Perseverance (score 87)

John seems to be a very perseverant person when it comes to attaining goals or committing to self-improvement. When he sets his mind to something, he finds the motivation and persistence within himself to keep at it and pursue his objectives fully and wholeheartedly. Players who score in this range tend to:

• Show a great deal of resilience, and will easily pick themselves up after difficult experiences (e.g. crushing losses, conflicts, harsh criticism, embarrassing mistakes, etc.).
• Be resolute and press on despite roadblocks like injuries, difficult challenges, or disappointments.
• Keep their "eyes on the prize", and see the long-term benefits of sticking to their goals.
• Depend more on internal sources of motivation (like personal pride, the desire to be a better player and learn new skills, etc.), and less on outside sources of motivation (like praise, rewards, encouragement from others, etc.).

Game Preparedness (score 70)

Getting mentally prepared for a game is generally a common practice for John. He seems to use several techniques to keep himself on the ball and ready to take on the challenges he faces. Players who score in this range can usually:

• Calm their nerves easily and get into "game mode".
• Find ways to motivate themselves and stay motivated.
• Improve their potential for self-improvement by being more involved in pre-game preparation strategies.

Mental Strength (score 88)

John's confidence and inner strength tend to be nearly unbreakable. He is able to stay positive in the face of trying situations and challenges, and can cope with high stress - he is not the type to crack under the pressure. In fact, tough times probably bring out the best in him. Players who score in this range tend to:

• Overcome self-doubt and negative thoughts easily (should they have any).
• Keep a positive mindset.
• Show consistency in their performances - they don't let problems get to them to the point where they seriously hinder their actions on the field.
• Resist head games and intimidation, and don't let people or situations throw them off keel.
• Detach themselves easily from personal problems when working.
• Accept the potential for failure or making a mistake without fear - they may not like it, but they can accept, learn from, and get over it.

Focus (score 86)

John's level of focus is remarkable. He likely uses many concentration techniques, and rarely, if ever, lets distractions interfere with his attention, especially when he needs it most. Players who score in this range tend to:

• Get into a "zone" where they are completely focused on the game.
• Ignore outside interferences (e.g. the crowd), and internal distractions (e.g. worry, anxiety, etc.).
• Keep their mind from wandering, even when benched.
• Have keen observation skills (e.g. will try to understand opponent strategies, identify weaknesses, etc.).

Accident Proneness (score 30)

John seems to be a reasonably cautious person, and rarely engages in reckless behavior that could put his physical health or career in jeopardy. He is likely a responsible person when playing sports. Athletes who score in this range usually:

• Think of the consequences of their behavior before acting.
• Respect game rules and their coach's rules.
• Take risks seriously and cautiously.

Need for Security (score 13)

John is comfortable with change and ambiguity; while he might prefer stability in his life, he seems to realize that this isn't always possible. When a situation changes unexpectedly, he can adapt quickly. Players who score in this range tend to:

• Accept and understand the uncertainty of a sports career.
• Adapt quickly to change or unexpected situations.
• Require little, if any reassurance of their chances of succeeding; they take things one day at a time and work towards a goal.

Physical Toughness (score 86)

John's physical toughness seems to be at the top level. When dealing with physically demanding preparation and tasks, he is likely to be able to keep up. This significantly improves his chances of success when up against players who are in top physical shape. Players who score in this range tend to:

• Be quite strict with their overall fitness program.
• Rigorously follow the rules of healthy habits that contribute to top shape.
• Be able to handle physically demanding tasks with stamina and endurance.

Team Spirit (score 28)

John appears to show little team spirit. He doesn't do much to support his teammates, and may be more focused on personal achievement than the team's success. Players who score in this range will often:

• Have difficulty placing their trust in the team and coaching staff.
• Show little loyalty to a team and may be more likely to want to leave.
• Show little pride in being part of the team.
• Be more concerned with attaining their own stardom than with success of the team.
• Believe that their teammates will let them down when it's crunch time.
• Be uninterested in team building exercises.
• Be unresponsive to coach's pre-game pep-talks.
• Take credit for success and not give credit to other players when it's due.

Academic Commitment (score 49)

John's responses indicate that he is generally committed to his academic success, but may not consider it a top priority. Unfortunately, this can be quite common in many college athletes with athletic scholarships. Players who score in this range may sometimes:

• Slack off in terms of their studies.
• Lack the motivation needed to put in or maintain a strong academic performance.
• Be fearful of a coach's disapproval if a practice or game is missed.
• Feel overwhelmed by demanding practices, game schedules, or fatigue.
• Have difficulty juggling the demands of academic and athletic success.

Athletic Commitment (score 66)

John is quite dedicated to his athletic success. Being a good athlete is generally important to him, perhaps one of his top priorities. Players who score in this range usually:

• Put a consistent effort into improving their skills or working hard during practices.
• Have the motivation and confidence to be a successful athlete.
• Maintain their athletic commitment even if they have other pursuits in mind that they feel are important.

At-Risk Athlete (score 52)

Note: This scale and the ones to follow are only provided for informational purposes, and do not count towards John's overall score. In addition, although a person may score high on these scales, it is not a direct indication that he or she will engage in the behaviors mentioned. However, if John's results highlight any areas of concern, they should be given serious consideration.

John's score on the At-Risk scale indicates that he possesses some of the characteristics defined in this assessment as potential risk factors for problematic behavior. Review the results below for more information.

Sensation-Seeking (score 69)

According to John's score, he seems to be a fairly strong sensation-seeker. People with this type of profile generally thrive on new, intense, and varied situations. Their personalities are associated with risk-taking because sensation-seeking drives individuals to seek out highly stimulating experiences, which often include risk. Sensation-seekers have strong positive reactions to intense stimuli. While there are many constructive aspects of this personality type, those with this trait may often take more risks, be more impulsive, and become bored more easily. In certain ways, a sensation-seeking personality is an asset - such individuals thrive on stress, action, uncertainty, and challenge. In other ways, it could be a liability - they may take outlandish risks. The latter issue is a concern. Sensation-seeking athletes may engage in disorderly conduct "off-field", which could cost them their career, or put themselves and others in danger.

Vulnerability to Peer Pressure (score 21)

John's responses indicate that he will rarely give in to peer pressure. Rather than following along with the rest of the group, he will often assert himself and do what he feels is right, even if it may not be the most popular choice. He isn't afraid to say "no" to people, especially in situations that involve taking reckless risks.

Sense of Invulnerability (score 62)

The Sense of Invulnerability subscale takes into account the belief that a pervasively optimistic attitude can actually be quite harmful. For people who are overly optimistic, their sense of personal control (over themselves and situations in general) is greatly overestimated. This could lead to a misjudgment of potential harm and adverse consequences when taking physical risks.

John's results indicate that he sometimes exhibits a sense of invulnerability. If combined with a tendency to be reckless, he may not always take the potential consequences of his actions into consideration. He has a somewhat unrealistic view of his likelihood of being harmed and as a result, there may be times when he will not take every precaution necessary to prevent injury to himself or others in risk-taking situations.

Rule-breaking Risk (score 56)

John's responses indicate that he is generally a rule-abider, but there are occasions when he will bend or break them. He may not always respect rules and regulations that are set in place by his coach or sports organization, and may not consistently take the time to think twice about the potential repercussions of his actions.

Aggression (score 44)

John's level of aggression may depend on the situation. Sometimes, he might withdraw from confrontation and will be able to keep his aggressiveness in check. On other occasions, he may either be unable or unwilling to curb his hostility and may seem to almost invite conflict. There are times when he could be hostile and aggressive with others, but this would more likely be a result of having a "bad day" rather than being a permanent staple of his personality.

Propensity Towards Dishonesty (score 59)

Although the relationship is not always cut and dry, attitudes do predict behavior. How you felt about the specific dishonest behaviors mentioned in this test is an excellent predictor of your own future behavior. However, an important issue to consider in terms of this scale is the fact that while such attitudes are highly correlated with actual behavior, the relationship is not 100%. For instance, someone may have very permissive attitudes towards occasional slips of others but that may not necessarily mean that he or she is inclined to engage in that kind of behavior. Keep that in mind while reading John's results.

A score in this range indicates that John's propensity for dishonest behavior is moderate. He can likely be trusted in some situations, but in others, he may take the less-than-honest route. This doesn't necessarily mean that he will "misbehave" and will need constant supervision, but there is a possibility that he may fall into the trap of acting inappropriately in tempting situations.

Impression Management (score 60)

This scale assesses to what degree the results on this assessment are distorted or manipulated. Many people will try to present themselves in a better light, especially if the stakes are high.

Test-takers' answers are compared to the responses obtained from a large sample of players. When someone systematically selects socially desirable responses that are rarely endorsed by others, there is a good reason to believe that a positive self-presentation bias is at play. A score that is suspiciously high may indicate that a person was lying, which may invalidate the whole assessment.

John picked a number of rarely endorsed responses; he seemed to be trying to present himself in a favorable light. Consequently, there is reason to believe that his results are not a totally accurate reflection of who he is.